Have you been following the Channel 4 series of "I'm Spazticus"?
If you haven't then I'm sure you'll be able to download it on you-tube sooner or later. There has been some activity on Facebook & Twitter stating that it is either offensive or it's pure genius. For the benefit of those who haven't seen the programme, it's basically a sketch show with disabled actors/comedians taking impairments and disability as a whole and then gag after gag after gag! As usual, I'm not about to sit on the fence on this one - Yes, you're right...... I Love it!
There are those of you who may/will feel uncomfortable watching the show as you feel it allows the audience to laugh at disabled people. However, there are many counter-arguments to this point of view. Here's a couple to get the debate started.......
Firstly, I don't believe for one minute that people are laughing at disabled people.....each joke, each punchline, each sketch seemed to highlight society's reaction towards disabled people - "bring on the social model!!!" Secondly, we as disabled people seem to have finally come to terms with a fact made by the veteran comedian, Lenny Henry, a couple of decades ago......a person has no right to laugh at others until they have laughed at themselves! My personal opinion is that it is a sign of progress when such a show is on the air and already seems to have many fans.
If for whatever reason you are offended by the programme, then I don't really have any advice for you but to log-on to t'internet and book an aeroplane ticket back to the 20th century.
More programmes like "I'm Spazticus" please, as they very simply prove in the most light-hearted way possible - Disability isn't funny, it's societies' stupidities that are now the joke!
Agree? Don't Agree? Amo is a joke?
Amo Raju
CEO - The Disability Syndicate
Amo is the Chief Executive of The Disability Syndicate - an organisation created to develop maintain and support organisations of and for disabled people
Thursday, 23 August 2012
Thursday, 12 July 2012
Please Let Us Tick A Box For You!
Has your funder asked you to work with a User Led
Organisation? Has central government given you targets which include consulting
the views of disabled people? Has your boss asked you to go talk to "that
disability place"?....If so, please use us - Seriously! We only set our organisations up
for your cause!
Across the country I'm constantly reminded that DPULO's
and CIL's are pulled in many directions by statutory, commercial and peer
voluntary agencies too. However, as CEO of two CIL's and having been asked to
sit on numerous committees, steering groups, consultation panels (call them what
you may), I believe it is time to review the purpose of such requests.
Are we asked for our input because our views are so
valuable? The cynic in me says No!
If you are asked of such requests, just for
a moment, cast your mind back to the last or perhaps current committee where
your presence was felt necessary....Was your involvement as a Disabled Peoples
Representative truly acknowledged? Were your views actually discussed? Not only
did they accept your thoughts on the subject matter but did they implement them
into a plan? Are simple matters deferred to the next
meeting then the meeting after that?....Or my favourite :- Was a plan tabled,
you and your organisation disagreed and commented on it but then it was
nevertheless rubber stamped by the powers that be? Oh yes, I think so!
Some of you may be paid members of staff, some will be
volunteers. However regardless of your status within your ULO, your time and
experience is invaluable and more importantly, irreplaceable. Remember, they
need you more than you think you need them.
My advice is to set a time table, log your thoughts on a
separate document, measure whether there has been adequate progress on the
subject matter and feel free to leave when it becomes naturally clear that your
input has merely ticked a box!!
Agree? Don't Agree? Like ticking boxes?
Amo Raju
Thursday, 21 June 2012
The Best Time for Personal Budgets?
Time to open a can of
worms……..
Those who have known me for a while will recall my prediction around 10 years ago when I said that staff at Disability Direct will be doing the job of Social Workers in the future. Support Planning and PB support services are a typical example of this. This approach was well received by social workers who could see we were helping them with their heavy workloads. But then came…..Council cuts.
Less Care Managers and even bigger workloads. It’s been reported across the country and certainly in the East Midlands that staff in local authorities prefer to refer & keep the “case” internally. Work it out….why would staff behave in this way? I think you know the reason.
Additionally, is the service provider “market” ready to meet the “new” spending needs of PB holders? Again there will be two schools of thought on this issue. As CEO of a user-led group, I’m regularly told by users “it’s the same old money under a new name, spent on the same old services”. How true too!
Ask a local authority
official and you’ll most likely be told that the number of PB’s awarded rises
year on year. Technically they’re right too. However, are budgets being used
“creatively”? I say creatively as this is the word used by “professionals” in
the authorities who want to see support plans which literally knock their socks
off! For example, in a time of recession and mass unemployment amongst
non-disabled youths, Support Planners are told they need to include
employment/training opportunities for disabled people!
Those who have known me for a while will recall my prediction around 10 years ago when I said that staff at Disability Direct will be doing the job of Social Workers in the future. Support Planning and PB support services are a typical example of this. This approach was well received by social workers who could see we were helping them with their heavy workloads. But then came…..Council cuts.
Less Care Managers and even bigger workloads. It’s been reported across the country and certainly in the East Midlands that staff in local authorities prefer to refer & keep the “case” internally. Work it out….why would staff behave in this way? I think you know the reason.
Additionally, is the service provider “market” ready to meet the “new” spending needs of PB holders? Again there will be two schools of thought on this issue. As CEO of a user-led group, I’m regularly told by users “it’s the same old money under a new name, spent on the same old services”. How true too!
Some think tank in a smokey
room came up with a great idea…. “Let’s support the creation of micro-providers
who will add more variety to the social care market”. Great idea. As I’m typing
this I can’t stop giggling….hence here I must say LOL (how cool and hip am I
hey?). I giggled because as the government pumped money into stimulating
micro-markets, it drastically reduced the services of Business Link Advisors.
Again, you’re not daft, you can work out where Im heading here.
Let me hark back to another
prediction I made 2 years ago. Brokerage Services!….. “There’s going to be a
need for brokers/support planners” they cried across the country. Suddenly,
every man and his aunty set up to be a “Broker”……. I predicted that 75% of
these brokers will be broke within a couple of years. Now don’t deny me… CEO
in “Smug Mode”. If there’s no referrals then there will be no brokers!
Now you’re asking….Oh
knowledgeable smug one….What’s the answer to the above? The truth is… I don’t
have an answer but I do have a thought as follows :
The current plan is not
working…..let’s be big enough to admit it and rewind not necessarily to the
beginning but to a point where we can achieve realistic and meaningful outcomes
…not for social workers, not for senior practitioners, not for ULO’s but for
disabled people who battled for years to get a Personal Budget.
I think It’s time for politicians,
the local authority and ULO’s to sit around the table and smoke cigars again.
Agree? Don’t Agree? CEO
too smug?
Amo
Friday, 15 June 2012
Wake-Up Bosses!!!
Apologies, I've not paid you much attention recently. Staff and some of you too advised that my blogs were missed....so no excuses...i've slapped my wrist.
Let the ranting re-commence.......................
Over the last month or so, I've been made aware of at least 3 organisations (obviously won't be saying who they are - as one of them were reported by their own staff!) where the hierarchy love & praise the work of The Disability Syndicate but their staff clearly demonstrate a contradictory approach. This poses a question or two, possibly three.....Do senior management receive a true report of what goes on at the front-line? Do front-line staff feel comfortable (maybe too comfortable) with choosing who they wish to work with? Or more seriously...is negativity towards another organisation a direct order from above?
This is where you'll be asking me "Amo, do you know what your staff are doing on the front-line?" Here, I can confidently say "pretty much so!". It's my job not only to make sure the pennies roll in but to keep in contact with my peers, my staff and more importantly the service users. I make it my job to talk to everyone and receive constant updates about "what's the word on the street?".
Back to that third question : I think we'll both agree on this.... As CEO if I say that staff will not be working with another organisation, then it's quite likely staff will comply with my request. If I was to do such a thing I think you as the community, the funder of The Disability Syndicate will be demanding my head on a stick at the front door...and quite rightly so.
As usual, by now you're saying..."get to the point Amo!".
My point : if you're the the gaffa of your organisation and you want to work with us....make sure your desire is conveyed to the staff. If you're gaffa and don't want to work with us, be polite and let me know and i'll make sure staff here only continue to work with like-minded peer groups. If you can't control your staff....WE WILL..
Love & Kisses...
Amo
CEO
Let the ranting re-commence.......................
Over the last month or so, I've been made aware of at least 3 organisations (obviously won't be saying who they are - as one of them were reported by their own staff!) where the hierarchy love & praise the work of The Disability Syndicate but their staff clearly demonstrate a contradictory approach. This poses a question or two, possibly three.....Do senior management receive a true report of what goes on at the front-line? Do front-line staff feel comfortable (maybe too comfortable) with choosing who they wish to work with? Or more seriously...is negativity towards another organisation a direct order from above?
This is where you'll be asking me "Amo, do you know what your staff are doing on the front-line?" Here, I can confidently say "pretty much so!". It's my job not only to make sure the pennies roll in but to keep in contact with my peers, my staff and more importantly the service users. I make it my job to talk to everyone and receive constant updates about "what's the word on the street?".
Back to that third question : I think we'll both agree on this.... As CEO if I say that staff will not be working with another organisation, then it's quite likely staff will comply with my request. If I was to do such a thing I think you as the community, the funder of The Disability Syndicate will be demanding my head on a stick at the front door...and quite rightly so.
As usual, by now you're saying..."get to the point Amo!".
My point : if you're the the gaffa of your organisation and you want to work with us....make sure your desire is conveyed to the staff. If you're gaffa and don't want to work with us, be polite and let me know and i'll make sure staff here only continue to work with like-minded peer groups. If you can't control your staff....WE WILL..
Love & Kisses...
Amo
CEO
Sunday, 18 March 2012
Back & To The Future
Hi,
Many thanks to those of you who sent your best wishes over the last few months. I'm pleased to report I'm back at work and fully charged, ready for action.
What's on the agenda?
1. Modernisation of day service activity for New Horizons
2. Personal Budgets Support Service & DD's role in Self-Directed Support
3. New premises forEnabled Art, New Horizons and Disability Direct
4. Stronger Infrastructure support within the Disability Syndicate
The list ever-growing and so it should be too!
I'm tweeting now....follow me "@SyndicateCEO"
See you soon!
Amo
Many thanks to those of you who sent your best wishes over the last few months. I'm pleased to report I'm back at work and fully charged, ready for action.
What's on the agenda?
1. Modernisation of day service activity for New Horizons
2. Personal Budgets Support Service & DD's role in Self-Directed Support
3. New premises forEnabled Art, New Horizons and Disability Direct
4. Stronger Infrastructure support within the Disability Syndicate
The list ever-growing and so it should be too!
I'm tweeting now....follow me "@SyndicateCEO"
See you soon!
Amo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)